Monday, October 14, 2019

WAG THE DOG

Wag the dog comes from the longer expression the tail wagging the dog.
The tail wagging the dog is an American idiom that dates back to at least the late 1800s. For the tail to wag the dog, then and now, indicates a backwards situation where a small or unimportant entity (the tail) controls a bigger, more important one (the dog).
Wag the dog went on to develop its own specialized political meaning. In 1997, a film called Wag the Dog came out, based on a 1993 novel of the same name by Larry Beinhart. The plot revolved around efforts to distract attention from a presidential scandal by fabricating a war.
The story intruded into real politics not long after its release. In 1998, when Bill Clinton’s scandal regarding Monica Lewinsky broke, he was accused of “wagging the dog.” Three days after admitting he had inappropriate relations with Lewinsky, he ordered missile strikes against two countries, allegedly to divert public attention from his sex scandal.

We see this phenomenon often in the local political scene more than any. Whenever there's a "hot" issue, it's not uncommon to find a "fire" of sorts being lit in another direction/area. Quite obviously, it's to diffuse the attention of the People on the real matters, ie matters that actually are important, and ultimately, will decide on the political direction of the country. Take for example the time when we were informed that a 11 year old kid was shot at in 2017 because he was found driving a car in which there were parangs and other dangerous items. That was when the 1MDB case was hotting up. 

In Malaysia Baru now, the people are marking the report card carefully. There are reverberations of dissent inside and outside. Actors were found to be acting badly and only protected from being fired by the director. Like in the movies, fanatical cartel lords have taken control of local councils and are quite obviously wreaking havoc with public opinions. Therefore, a "tail to wag" the dog needed to be created. Based on topical statements bandied about, we all should know why there's a sudden interest in the dead and buried. Even news rags are delving into the obscure lands where there was no previous interest, all in the name of wagging the dog. They just had to revive a dead dog to make it the bogeyman so that the fires can burn freely elsewhere. 
Watch the 1997 movie called Wag the Dog. All will be clear.

Sunday, October 13, 2019

To kick one when one is down?

About 10 days ago, I received a rather stern show cause letter from the UK institute of Chartered Accountants. It included a screenshot of my profile in Linked-In and without reservation accused me as "passing off" as a Chartered Accountant. Not only that, it asked me to sign an undertaking letter not to use the designation "CA" (Chartered Accountant) in my profile.

I wrote back stating that I earned the CA designation from 2 different premier professional institutes, and the CPA and Fellowship designations from other global institutes and that it was free to independently verify this assertion. I asked the UK Institute as to how they deemed me to be "passing off" when the description was 100% factually correct. I also enquired how come the Institute was scouring social media to suss out the pretenders or was this letter the result of a complaint.

A couple of days of silence ensued and then the Institute replied "After carrying out further checks, we confirm that no misrepresentation had taken place and we are closing this case. Due to data protection act, we are unable to reveal the details of the complainant". 

Did the above reply mean to say "We are sorry, we rushed off a show cause letter to you, a senior member of the accounting fraternity, without a thorough investigation of a poison pen letter" ? If so, this is indeed is a strange way of saying "We apologize".

I informed the UK Institute that they ought to be more conscientious in future and in the interest of goodwill, was letting this ride. While I know mistakes can be made sometimes, a professional body (especially one that has vast resources to hire professionals to verify claims) should first thoroughly check each allegation, especially those that come from picking up random bits and pieces from social media posts. 



Martin Vengadesan (all credit to Martin) explains the LTTE

KINIGUIDE
972
SHARES

Who were the LTTE?

Published:   |  Modified: 
KINIGUIDE | The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) was one of a number of competing guerilla groups that fought against the Sri Lankan government for an independent homeland in the north and east of the island, where a majority of people were Tamils.
It gradually gained pre-eminence among these groups and at its peak held sway over large areas in the north of the island, establishing its own government.
Vilified by foes for its use of child soldiers, suicide bombers and political assassinations, the LTTE did draw significant support from those who felt the cause of fighting Sinhalese majority oppression was a valid one.
Eventually, in 2009, the LTTE was defeated militarily, its iconic figurehead Velupillai Prabhakaran (photo) and most of its leaders were killed, while others were arrested. More than 10,000 fighters were rehabilitated, even as a humanitarian crisis unfolded in territory the LTTE formerly held.
Roots of the war
Historically, waves of Tamil migration to Sri Lanka date back thousands of years. Tamil kingdoms in the north co-existed alongside Sinhala dynasties in the south and centre of the island for much of the time. 
There were even occasions when the Tamils, in the form of the Chola Dynasty centred in Thanjavur (modern-day Tamil Nadu), conquered most of the island.
Their strength peaked under the great warrior-king Rajendra Chola I, who annexed most of the island in 1017 and abducted the Sinhala ruler Mahinda V.
Although the Sinhala kings gradually regained their lands, an independent Tamil kingdom centred around the city of Jaffna existed for many centuries.
However, colonial rule united the island, and when Sri Lanka was granted independence in 1948, the Tamils found themselves in a minority, with Sinhalas making up 69 percent of the island's population.
Ethnic tensions boiled over in 1956 with the passing of the Sinhala Only Act which replaced English as the official language of the nation. Protests over the act led to racial killings with more than 100 Tamils killed. In 1958 a larger number died when tensions between the Sinhalese and Tamils erupted again.
Birth of the Tigers
In the 1970s, Sri Lanka became increasingly polarised. This included the rise of Sinhalese extremist violence through the left-leaning Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna which staged an insurrection against the Sirivamo Bandaranaike government in 1971. An estimated 30,000 people lost their lives.
During this time many Tamil youths also felt that their politicians were conceding too much ground to the federal government.
A number of young Tamils began carrying out guerilla operations against the authorities. 
This culminated in the assassination in 1975 of Jaffna mayor Alfred Duraiappah, who was shot dead in a temple. His masked killers targeted him for betraying the Tamil cause.
A couple of years after the killing, a group known as the Tamil New Tigers claimed that Duraiappah had been shot by one Velupillai, who was to become the central figure of the LTTE.
Civil War begins
Ethnic strife continued to escalate. Following the 1977 general election, more than 300 Tamils were killed in anti-Tamil pogroms, whereas in 1981, the historic Jaffna library was burned down by state security forces.
In 1983, this became an all-out war with the events of Black July. The LTTE carried out an ambush on a Sri Lanka army patrol, killing 13 soldiers, and in retaliation hundreds, maybe thousands, of Tamils were slain.
In the Cold War environment, it was easy for rebel groups to get arms, financial backing and training. As such there were a number of rival groups ostensibly fighting the same cause as the LTTE.
In April 1984, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi invited the leaders of the five leading Tamil militant groups, the Eelam People's Revolutionary Liberation Front (EPRLF), Eelam Revolutionary Organisation of Students (EROS), Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), People's Liberation Organisation of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE) and Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation (TELO), for talks aimed at uniting the groups.
It didn't work as, over time, the LTTE became the dominant group, wiping out its rivals often by committing fraternal killings of captured rebels.
The LTTE also became known for its use of child soldiers, suicide bombers and political assassinations, including many of moderate Tamil politicians who still supported the federal position, instead of advocating for a separate Tamil homeland.
Despite the reputation for violent methods, the LTTE gained much sympathy and financial support from among the diaspora. Financing came from a number of places, including Malaysia. 
Selvarasa Pathmanathan, who eventually became the LTTE's chief international spokesperson, operated from Malaysia from 1987-1990 before decamping to Thailand.
At its peak, the LTTE operated a de facto state under its control, named Tamil Eelam, with Kilinochchi as its administrative capital. It established its own air force and navy, and had its own currency, radio, television as well as health, education and court systems.
The LTTE's relationship with India soured over the presence of the Indian Peace Keeping Force from 1987 to 1990 and this prompted one of its most notorious acts in May 1991, when a suicide bomber killed former Indian prime minister Rajiv Gandhi and 14 others at a campaign rally in Sriperumbudur, Tamil Nadu.
Two years later, another suicide bomber took the life of Sri Lanka's president, Ranasinghe Premadasa.
The final years
While the assassinations made some dent to its popularity, the LTTE generally maintained a degree of strength and support for a good 20 years. At one point in 2002, the LTTE dropped its demand for a separate state and appeared to settle for regional autonomy.
A ceasefire treaty was declared, and it appeared as if the fighting might be finally over with a permanent solution, but talks were stalled after six rounds, during which the region was also badly hit by the 2004 Asian tsunami.
In 2006, the recently-elected president of Sri Lanka, Mahinda Rajapaksa (above), decided against maintaining the peace and set out to destroy the LTTE militarily. His ruthless scorched earth tactics included the internment of Tamil civilians in concentration camps.
Finally, in May 2009, the LTTE was defeated militarily and Velupillai was killed along with his entire family and most of his loyal supporters. 
The 26-year war cost the lives of an estimated 80,000-100,000 people. Many human rights atrocities against civilians were carried out in the Sri Lankan Army's final push for victory.
Selvarasa, who attempted to keep the LTTE alive, was arrested in a Kuala Lumpur hotel within three months of the defeat.
The years since
Sri Lanka has engaged in a painful rebuilding process. Velupillai had a cult-like following that initially refused to believe he was dead, but over time, supporters came to acknowledge that the war had left no winners.
On Sept 4, 2016, Sri Lanka's High Commissioner to Malaysia, Ibrahim Ansar, was assaulted (photo) at KL International Airport by locals, showing that there were still some residual tensions beneath the surface.
Meanwhile in India, a political party called the Naam Tamilar Katchi has tried to play on the LTTE legacy. 
Led by film director Seeman and calling for a unified Tamil homeland in both Tamil Nadu and northern Sri Lanka, it has very little support among the voting public, garnering less than two percent at the Tamil Nadu state elections in 2016, despite fielding 234 candidates.
The focus over the last 10 years has been on rebuilding and rehabilitation, which has also been supported by the diaspora. 
There are many thousands of Sri Lankan Tamil refugees around the world, and also a high number who were internally displaced.

Tuesday, October 8, 2019

Friend or Foe ?

While parochialism would want us to cheer the middle kingdom's emergence in the world's domain in most spheres, I am very very WARY of their style of rule. I just don't trust the red leadership at all. If anything, it has shown us that it will dictate terms for society, and will use whatever means it desires to achieve the goal(s). That's hardly a benign way to cultivate a new country, one that had been subject to 70 years of brutal communism. The biggest large scale genocide was not in Russia nor WW2 Germany but in China itself. The late "chairman" killed many millions during his rule. While too much freedom (if there's such a thing) can be used to limit/end people's freedom (like the right to arms), I rather the devil we know than emerging devils who wanna shine now. Let's face it, can you imagine anyone wanting to immigrate to China? Maybe the Great Leader (I mean the real one) can sell the 2000 year old wall to Trump ? Win-win for both.

Welcome to the Islamic Republic of GAZA

Suggestion to manage Gaza after the current war with Israel:  1) Compel Israel to rebuild the border wall so that Gaza becomes like Berlin b...